#Adios script font free update
#Adios script font free pro
#Adios script font free plus

I count myself lucky because I have very poor heel hold with e.g. People who are prone to heel slippage with these minimal heel counters should take note of this as there is no easy solution. Version 2 has 5 rows of eyelets but no additional eyelet for a runner’s knot.

#Adios script font free plus

Version 1 had 5 primary rows of eyelets plus an additional last eyelet located obliquely to facilitate a runner’s knot. By comparison, v1’s tongue only uses the two slot design. One at the front running centrally, and two more closer to the sides higher up. The tongue is only attached to the upper at the front, and is completely free-floating at the sides, but it eliminates movement by means of three different slots, through which the laces run. This toe guard does an excellent job of raising the height of the toe box and really gives the toe box a lot more volume. There is a well designed internal laminate that forms the basis of the internal toe guard up front. There is a small amount of padding built into the back of the ankle opening to support heel hold on either side of the Achilles, but otherwise the entire heel counter could easily be compressed. This is inelastic and adhered to the upper on both sides of the midfoot. The main source of support in the shoe comes in the form of an internal support strap that reinforces the midfoot area. There is some lamination around the edges of the ankle opening and tongue, but otherwise the upper is extremely minimal and simple. The upper has moved away from a more traditional construct to a thin engineered mesh upper. The shoes definitely feel unstable at the heel when walking around, and if you rock too far back on your heels, chances are you are going to feel like you are falling backwards.

#Adios script font free pro

The NB SC Elite 3 is the other shoe that comes to mind with this sort of very directed forward spring from the heel, but with the Rebellion Pro 2, it is much more exaggerated than in the NB).

There is a lot more natural directed rebound in the forward direction, something that version 1 did not have (nor indeed a lot of other super shoes. It is immediately obvious on lacing up and walking around that version 2 is significantly bouncier, and a lot of that spring seems to be stemming from the midfoot and heel. Putting the shoes side by side, v2 does look marginally longer than v1, though on step in with socks on, the amount of space in front of the toes was still about the same for both versions. So it came as a bit of a surprise when the measured widths of the shoe were nearly identical to v1, and it came in a hair lighter as well. The whole shoe just looked longer and taller. Platform Width: v2 77mm heel 62mm midfoot 115mm forefootĭerek: My first impression on taking the shoes out of the box was how much larger the shoe looked than its predecessor. Stack Height: men’s 38 mm heel / 36 mm forefoot (2mm drop) He has a 2:39 marathon PR from the 2022 Zurich Marathon.Īpprox. Still relatively unstable due to high stack and narrow platform - Derekĭerek is in his 40’s and trains 70-80 miles per week at 7 to 8 minute pace in mostly tropical conditions in Singapore. Some people may experience heel slippage - Derek More rounded anatomical shaped toebox - Derekīetter for heel strikers than before - Derek Would it ruin a good thing? Read on to find out. All in all, quite a few differences from version 1. Finally, the outsole coverage was also modified, presumably to improve stability.

#Adios script font free update

Also, bucking the trend of the two-year update cycle, they also re-designed the midsole geometry to improve the rocker and make it more friendly to non-elite runners. I disagree with that sentiment and my personal take is that it ran a bit narrow in the toebox, such that the 5th toe often got a bit squashed, and people with larger feet ended up having to size up in it.Įnter version 2, with a thinner, less structured upper, and what appears to be a more rounded, higher volume toebox. I count myself among the group of positive “responders” to the shoe, and went out and bought myself another two pairs of the same model after getting my initial testing pair.Īmong the criticisms of version 1 was that the shoe ran a little short. That shoe has been out for over a year now, and it has garnered a rather polarizing response from runners with someabsolutely gushing over the assistive ride, while for others it just didn’t work at all. Derek: The Mizuno Wave Rebellion Pro silhouette is easily the most radical among the current crops of super shoes on the market.